Used to be, but part 2 sucks major ass.Shinobi_93 wrote:wow... so ill assume you arent a naruto fan!?Kazuma the Shell Bullet wrote:Kishimoto with part 2 = Bland and generic characters in both personality and outward appearance. Terrible storytelling with even worse pacing. Awful character development that consist of pain, loneliness and the sadness of pain. And artwork that looks a color book. Dont forget Kishi's whoring of the sharingan.Shinobi_93 wrote:Naruto imo, is way better!
i like them both!! but i feel more attached to naruto!! i actually love sword fights but for me the fights in naruto are better... and i also like narutos history and bonds to other characters!! if you had to judge on the first few arcs of naruto.. well yeah they are crap... but later on when the whole think with sasuke happens the eps just rock!!! well bleach is too "quick"... the rescue rukia arc was awsome but a little wierd... i mean they cause so much destruction in sereitei and all... and then in the end of the arc they are best of allies!! come on!!! ANYWAY NARUTO IS JUST BETTER THAN BLEACH!!!
And Part 1 is cheaply ripped off of Hunter x Hunter
Current Bleach isn't much better. Hueco Mundo Arc is a poorly done carbon copy of Soul Society Arc, only replacing Rukia with Orihime, and the Captains with the Espada. The arc's only saving grace is the Grimmjow vs. Ichigo fight, which is still inferior to their first 2.
